Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 02:10

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Can you list every album you have ever listened to?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Scientists are experimenting with a completely new approach to combat human aging - Earth.com
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Tucker Barnhart Elects Free Agency - MLB Trade Rumors
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Why do people love to live alone in a house?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
9 Things Women’s Health Doctors Would Never Do - HuffPost
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
NASA sets new potential launch date for Ax-4 mission to ISS - SpaceNews